Ken Adam collaborated with Kubrick on Dr. Strangelove and Barry Lyndon. The comparison brings together two different challenges: creating expressive architecture and organizing a period film around existing spaces and production decisions.
The War Room establishes a relationship before explaining a place
The War Room in Dr. Strangelove brings its participants together around a table beneath lighting that focuses attention. The space does not need to depict every part of a real facility to be understood. Its scale and emptiness create a relationship among people, information, and power. Ken Adam is credited as production designer, and the set’s form makes it possible to study how architecture actively participates in a scene instead of merely providing a backdrop.
The table establishes a collective arrangement, but it does not erase differences in position. The figures can seem small within an enormous structure as they make decisions with consequences that extend beyond what is visible. This disproportion can be read as a comment on institutional authority. That is an interpretation of the image, not a record of a proven individual intention. To attribute the origin of a specific detail, it is best to consult sketches or testimony that explicitly identifies it.
Adam’s interview with The British Entertainment History Project helps place his work within a professional conversation with Kubrick. The interview recalls experiences and decisions from the designer’s perspective. Its value lies in describing a practice, not in replacing all the preparatory documents. Like any retrospective account, it should be associated with its author and date. An anecdote about one solution does not automatically establish who was responsible for every aspect of the finished set.
Cinematography also plays a part. The construction provides surfaces, heights, and placement options; lighting determines which relationships become visible and how strongly. The same space can create different impressions depending on the framing, exposure, and camera position. Recognizing Adam’s contribution does not require artificially separating it from that collaboration. The design prepares conditions that other departments use and transform during the filming of a sequence.
Barry Lyndon’s design is not limited to building from scratch
Barry Lyndon takes a different approach to architecture. The film uses period spaces and locations whose selection, adaptation, and arrangement are part of the production design. The work does not necessarily involve inventing every wall. It may mean deciding which place suits an action, how to arrange the furniture, and which elements to add or keep out of frame. Equating design with building everything from scratch would obscure many of those decisions.
The credits identify Adam as production designer and Roy Walker as art director. This division helps avoid assigning everything indiscriminately to a single person. The result depends on teams that prepare, transform, and maintain spaces, as well as those who make broader decisions. A recognizable interior alone does not reveal what was already there, what was moved, or what was built. Reconstructing those processes requires specific documents or testimony.
The relationship with light is once again crucial. An available window, doorway, or depth affects the placement of the camera and lighting sources. John Alcott described photographic challenges that had to be solved within those settings. Design is not a static image that is later photographed without modification. It must accommodate movement, continuity, and technical requirements. A historically natural appearance can depend on highly deliberate organization.
Space also shapes social relationships. Distances between people, places to wait, and ways of entering can convey hierarchies without a character explaining them. A drawing room can facilitate display, surveillance, or exclusion, depending on how it is occupied. That reading belongs to the staging as a whole. Adam contributes a material dimension to these possibilities, but he should not be treated as the sole author of every dramatic relationship that editing and performance bring to life within the space.
Comparing projects without turning a style into a formula
The War Room and the interiors of Barry Lyndon do not follow the same recipe for spectacle. In the first, a highly abstract construction concentrates power relationships; in the second, a period look organizes people and objects differently. Adam’s professional continuity makes it possible to compare challenges, not reduce both results to an unchanging visual signature. A designer can change strategies from one project to another without losing the ability to shape a vision.
Adam’s work on other productions helps put his career in context, but it does not automatically explain what he did with Kubrick. The 1997 interview recalls their professional contact after Dr. No and helps contextualize the Dr. Strangelove assignment. That connection does not justify treating every film as a variation on the James Bond sets. The history of a professional relationship and the analysis of a spatial solution belong to different scales.
To study a specific contribution, it helps to compare the preparatory material with what was built and what was filmed. A sketch may contain an idea that changed; a photograph of a set may show areas that never appear on screen; a shot may create a spatial relationship that exists only because of the framing. These differences do not diminish the value of the design. They help explain how a proposal changes as it enters a collective, time-based process.
Adam’s collaboration with Kubrick is best understood by keeping that chain in view. Design means proposing and organizing material conditions, not independently controlling the entire final image. In Dr. Strangelove, those conditions make a gathering of power visible within an unsettling scale. In Barry Lyndon, they help shape social relationships within period spaces. The comparison preserves what is specific to each project and avoids attributing all the effects these architectures produce in the films to one person.
Sources: Ken Adam, interview by Rodney Giesler, The British Entertainment History Project, 1997; credits for Dr. Strangelove (1964) and Barry Lyndon (1975); Criterion Collection, Barry Lyndon credits. Interpretations of power and scale are analyses of the filmed spaces.
View all articles in Kubrick's Cinematography, Editing, and Design Crew