A waltz can accompany machines that do not dance or introduce everyday life that soon becomes uncertain. Its pulse and phrases offer ways of relating to movement, but each film uses those possibilities differently.
2001: Perceiving a Choreography Among Machines
Johann Strauss II’s “The Blue Danube” accompanies movements through space in 2001. The association lets us perceive coordination among vehicles, trajectories, and rotations. Each turn does not have to correspond exactly to a dance figure. The music’s continuity organizes an experience in which technical operations acquire a rhythm the viewer can follow as a relationship among moving bodies.
The study of the two Strausses in 2001 distinguishes this work from Richard Strauss’s Also Sprach Zarathustra. Sharing a surname does not make the compositions variations of the same piece or make them both waltzes. Identifying the composer and the work avoids building a musical comparison on a coincidence of names.
The sense of coordination also depends on the editing. The music can continue across changes in scale and position while the audience experiences continuity of movement. A spacecraft first appears within a vast space and then in relation to another structure. The waltz helps connect these images without replacing the visual information about approach, distance, and orientation.
The association between future technology and an earlier work creates a sense of temporal distance. It does not prove that the characters are listening to the music or that an entire dance has been moved into space. The viewer recognizes or perceives a musical organization that changes their experience of the machines. The reading of mechanical elegance or courtesy belongs to this audiovisual relationship, not to a literal statement by the vehicles.
Eyes Wide Shut: Musical Continuity Across Everyday Gestures
Eyes Wide Shut uses Waltz No. 2 from Shostakovich’s Suite for Variety Orchestra. The publisher Boosey & Hawkes explains that the suite circulated for a time under the misattributed title Jazz Suite No. 2. Correctly identifying the work does not require ignoring that history, but it does mean avoiding the implication that both names, without qualification, refer to the same original classification.
The analysis of the music in Eyes Wide Shut places its use within the film’s overall sound. In the introduction of Bill and Alice, the waltz accompanies a progression through bodies, rooms, and preparations. The music can provide continuity across different actions without the characters dancing. Its function relates to the organization of a social and domestic world, not only to the literal depiction of a dance floor.
The familiarity of a musical structure can make ordinary gestures seem to flow easily into one another. However, that initial impression does not confirm the stability of the relationship we learn about later. An opening can present an appearance of fluency that the story complicates. The analysis must preserve the distinction between the order of visible movements and the incomplete understanding of those performing them.
The later dance at the party presents a different situation. There, bodies negotiate closeness within a specific social interaction. Not all the music at the gathering should be confused with the waltz in the opening. Identifying each passage and its source makes it possible to compare musical organization and social interaction without treating the entire soundtrack as a single recurring piece.
Musical Movement Does Not Explain the Dramatic Relationship on Its Own
A waltz can offer regularity and continuity, but a film decides how to relate them to the action. A figure may move in a compatible way, remain still, or disrupt the expectation. Musical counterpoint examines cases in which the image creates distance from what the music seems to promise. Not every use of a waltz is ironic, and not every instance of coordination implies harmony between characters.
The courtship of Barry and Lady Lyndon offers a useful contrast. The presence of music in a social scene and the attention given to glances or movements are not enough to classify it as a waltz. The Schubert passage associated with the courtship has a different musical identity. Comparing its function with the earlier examples requires preserving that distinction instead of using “waltz” as an imprecise synonym for elegant music.
The marches and collective rhythms offer another point of comparison. A rhythm can coordinate a formation, mark a step, or accompany an operation without dancing. The functions of regularity, turning, and forward motion are not interchangeable. Music proposes a temporal organization; the bodies and the situation determine what kind of activity can be read alongside it.
The relationship between classical repertoire and recorded sound raises the question of performance. A composition is not fully identified by its name: timbre, tempo, and articulation belong to a specific version. The film incorporates that recorded performance and selects its duration. That is why a comparison of waltzes should consider the excerpt used, rather than relying solely on the prestige or era of their composers.
In 2001, the coordination accompanies a technical voyage; in Eyes Wide Shut, it plays a part in the presentation and memory of human relationships. The musical resemblance raises a question about movement and continuity. Differences in bodies, spaces, and narrative position make it impossible to reduce the two uses to a shared intention that would automatically explain them both.
Films analyzed: Stanley Kubrick, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968); Eyes Wide Shut (1999); Barry Lyndon (1975). Documentation: Film music credits. Boosey & Hawkes, Dmitri Shostakovich profile, note on the historical identification and Waltz No. 2.
View all articles in Music, Voices, and Sound Design in Kubrick