The length of a source shapes the work, but it does not determine a proportionate film runtime. A short story may require new connections; a novel may be concentrated around a single line; a novella may expand the time devoted to encounters that pass quickly in the reading.
A long novel requires choosing a trajectory, not just cutting episodes
Thackeray’s adaptation in Barry Lyndon shows that condensing a source does not simply mean removing pages until it reaches a viable runtime. Decisions must be made about which relationships will sustain the protagonist’s trajectory, which changes need a scene, and which can be understood through their consequences. That selection establishes a new form of continuity among episodes that the text develops differently.
The study of Thackeray and Barry Lyndon examines specific transformations. In terms of scale, removing one section can increase the relative importance of another. A retained scene no longer occupies the same place within a different set of episodes. Its function must be assessed in the finished film, not solely by the presence of a similar situation in the book.
Film can also devote an extended duration to an action that written narration summarizes quickly. A duel, a wait, or an exchange of glances needs time to unfold positions and changes. Condensing a life story does not require speeding up every scene. Selection makes it possible to combine major omissions with close attention to moments that define relationships.
The balance between summary and experience thus shifts in two directions. Periods are compressed, while actions are expanded. Measuring fidelity by the number of retained episodes overlooks this reorganization. A brief element in the source can become the audiovisual center of gravity; another, more extensive one can be transformed into a comment, a transition, or a visible consequence.
Dream Story: a brief source can sustain extended encounters
Dream Story is a novella, not a screenplay that merely needs illustration. Eyes Wide Shut uses a sequence of encounters, returns, and stories whose cinematic duration depends on the staging. Walking, waiting for a response, and negotiating entry can take time without necessarily adding a new adventure to the basic sequence of events.
The adaptation of Schnitzler makes it possible to distinguish expanded duration from expanded plot. A conversation can retain a recognizable function while unfolding through pauses, movement, or resistance. The image makes the space separating the speakers perceptible; the sound lets us hear a hesitation. This material is not filler simply because it does not correspond to an additional sentence in the literary text.
Transferring the context also requires building relationships that the source assumed its original readers would recognize. Forms of address, services, and social spaces all contribute to that reconstruction. Dialogue that explains a world can provide information while shaping the protagonist’s access to it. The adaptation decides how much needs to be made explicit and what can be understood through behavior.
The point of view affects scale as much as the number of episodes does. Keeping the audience close to a character may require preserving their waits and checks. A version that showed all the other characters’ actions in parallel would have a different length and distribute knowledge differently. Expanding the visible world is not always the best way to preserve the experience of a source.
A short story as a starting point: expansion means creating new relationships
The development of A.I. began with Brian Aldiss’s short story Super-Toys Last All Summer Long and went through treatments that expanded its possibilities. The archive preserves working versions associated with different writers. This material documents a development process, not a film made by Kubrick. The 2001 film was directed by Steven Spielberg and must be distinguished from those earlier stages.
The development of A.I. and its treatments examines the collaborators’ contributions. In terms of scale, a brief source may offer a situation, a relationship, or a problem without containing all the connections needed for a feature film. Expanding it requires deciding which events extend that question and which introduce a different direction. Adding duration is not simply a matter of describing what is already there in greater detail.
The documentation for 2001 reveals another relationship among the initial story, the novel, and the screenplay. The collaboration between Kubrick and Clarke cannot be reduced to a linear translation of a finished book. Expansion and writing influenced each other during development. This example helps distinguish a starting source from an associated literary work: both can be part of the same project without occupying the same place in its history.
The literary adaptations by Kubrick bring together other changes in voice, structure, and medium. The specific question here is what must be developed to sustain the chosen scale. A film needs temporal and spatial relationships, but it can choose to leave certain explanations open. Expanding a source does not require resolving all its silences or turning every implication into a depicted episode.
Literary length, then, is a starting point, not a conversion formula. Selection, compression, and expansion can coexist in the same adaptation. To describe the result, it helps to identify which line is followed, what is given duration, and what new connections make it possible to move from one situation to another. This comparison explains specific choices without rating the work according to a supposed equivalence between pages and minutes.
Films discussed: Stanley Kubrick, Barry Lyndon (1975); Eyes Wide Shut (1999); 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Source texts: William Makepeace Thackeray, The Luck of Barry Lyndon; Arthur Schnitzler, Dream Story; Brian Aldiss, Super-Toys Last All Summer Long. University of the Arts London, Stanley Kubrick Archive, SK/18/3/1 and SK/18/3/1/3/11, A.I. treatments; SK/12/1, development of 2001. Steven Spielberg, A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001), credits.
View all articles in Narrative, Screenplay, and Adaptation in Kubrick