Institutional Violence in Kubrick: Rules That Authorize Harm

Paths of Glory: Turning a Command Decision into Procedure

The court-martial in Paths of Glory does not begin from a neutral position. The decision to punish follows a failed attack and the need to assign responsibility downward. The soldiers selected for trial enter the proceedings after a selection process that has already shaped what can count as an acceptable response. The judicial form does not erase that prior direction; it gives it a venue, documents, and a recognizable sequence of interventions.

Dax tries to introduce circumstances that might allow what happened to be judged differently. The difficulty is not simply finding persuasive words. He must speak within a procedure that limits which arguments receive attention and how much they can change the expected conclusion. The analysis of the court-martial distinguishes these specific constraints. Violence is tied to the power to decide what counts as evidence and what is treated as a disruption of order.

The order to fire on their own positions offers a contrast. The artillery officer demands written confirmation and does not immediately carry out the request made over the phone. That demand interrupts the passage from command intent to physical action. The document would not be a mere formality: it would make responsibility identifiable, when verbal urgency attempts to shift it elsewhere. The film shows a point where procedure can prevent harm, even as it organizes it in other scenes.

The execution requires distributed cooperation. After the sentence, preparations, escorts, and clearly defined roles come into play. Each participant can carry out a partial task without having made the initial decision, but dividing up the roles does not erase the connections between those actions. The distance between authorizing and carrying out the sentence makes it difficult to attribute the outcome to a single act, while still allowing us to trace the chain that makes it possible.

Full Metal Jacket: A Rule Sustained by Voices and Fellow Recruits

Hartman exercises authority through orders that regulate bodies, names, responses, and movements. The barracks is not a space where recruits can freely choose the terms of the conversation. Repeated formulas make obedience a visible and audible practice. Verbal violence is woven into this everyday structure, so it does not always appear as an exception to training, but as one of its operating methods.

Collective punishment for Pyle’s mistakes changes the relationships among the recruits. One person’s struggles become a burden for everyone else. This distribution creates an incentive for the group to monitor and pressure whoever they see as responsible for their suffering. Hartman’s language and discipline must be considered alongside this shift: authority also acts by getting subordinates to administer some of the coercion among themselves.

The nighttime assault on Pyle should not be mistaken for an explicit order from Hartman shown onscreen. His fellow recruits carry it out. This distinction matters because it allows us to examine responsibility without erasing individual agency. The system of punishments provides a context and directs hostility, but the scene retains the concrete actions of those who participate, hesitate, or watch. Institutions and individuals are not mutually exclusive explanations, nor interchangeable excuses.

Nor does learning to use the rifle, on its own, resolve the situation that has developed. Improvement in a valued skill can be rewarded while other forms of harm go unaddressed. The film separates the measurable outcome that training values from the relationships surrounding it. Describing that separation does not require diagnosing Pyle: it is enough to compare which behaviors are corrected, which are praised, and which have no avenue for response.

A Clockwork Orange: Displaying Harm as Proof of Usefulness

The Ludovico Technique turns Alex into the subject of a treatment whose administrators present its results. His restraint and forced exposure to images are part of a procedure overseen by specialists. The scene lays out instruments, observers, and a stated goal. This organization allows suffering to be described as a stage in an intervention, shifting attention away from what the subject experiences and toward what is expected of him.

The public demonstration adds a second operation. Alex is assaulted and put on display before an audience to prove that he no longer reacts as he did before. His inability to defend himself becomes evidence in favor of the treatment. The analysis of the Ludovico Technique explores the question of choice; from the perspective of institutional violence, the key issue is who defines success. What amounts to helplessness for the character can be presented to others as the technique working correctly.

The chaplain’s objection shows that an institution does not necessarily speak with one voice. His moral question differs from the minister’s assessment of usefulness. The disagreement makes visible the criteria that the demonstration tries to fold into a simple conclusion. Asking about the relationship between progress and harm requires us to consider that conflict rather than assume a procedure is acceptable because its promoters present it as an improvement.

The three films allow us to trace decisions, mediations, and responses without reducing all authority to a single form. The court, the instructor, and the treatment distribute harm in different ways. Obedience and disobedience appear at specific points in these chains, while the viewer’s position in relation to violence depends on which stages they can observe. Naming an institution explains the framework; identifying who decides, carries out, resists, or stays silent makes it possible to examine how that framework produces actions.

References: Stanley Kubrick, Paths of Glory (1957), A Clockwork Orange (1971), and Full Metal Jacket (1987). A comparative reading of the procedures and actions depicted.

View all articles in Themes and Conflicts in Kubrick's Cinema